Averaging feature

abedhaddad

Hi!

1) The export is glitchy, I’m having a hard time exporting the data with time on the x-axis, it’s stuck on photometric.

2) is it possible to switch around the apply and cancel buttons? When I press enter it cancels on me and that’s a little frustrating.

3) is it possible to create separate averages all at once, for example, if I check BW3 and Pink, it will average them together when in reality I would like to create two averages, one for BW3 and one for pink. It is a little time-consuming. It would be great also if the naming is automated from the group name, that would make it more user-friendly as well.

zbyszek

abedhaddad, @jacob-thomas

Well, we have addressed most of the issues in the rc4 version of the software.

The changes as of 11/08/2022:

Improved stability
Multiple averages can be plotted at once
Tabs switching fixed
Enter key triggers “Apply” not “Cancel” in sample selection dialog

Enjoy!

AnnaJ

Hello,

As a reply:
Ad 1) Data export options are available in Menu -> Options. There You may choose units that will be exported. Multi choice is possible. Values exported to file are independent of those on plot so changing units on Y/X Axis in Analytic Tab have no result on export.

Ad 2) Next release will have default selection of apply button.

Ad 3) That is a big change. Of course, if most users prefer such solution - we would realize it but it demands from user proper sample files management and makes impossible to average data from more than one group. We suggest to reconsider what would be the most convinient and efficient way to create averages and then we will provide changes.

abedhaddad

zbyszek @AnnaJ

These updates are great thank you!!

Anna, to point (1), I figured it out now that the selection of the x axis is coming from the report graph options, and this might be confusing for the user.
So now when I select time, i actually get time on the x axis in my exported .dat file. if I select lux and time, it gives me both options for the x axis in the .dat file. So basically you are controlling the y axis export from the export options and the x axis from the report options, which is a little confusing. Something to think about.

as for the multiple averages, that make things quicker in terms of plotting all at once, and you’ll find that conservation professionals are usually very detail oriented in terms of data management 🙂 This would prove very helpful when examining many points of interest. Just a thought.

Thanks!
Abed

AnnaJ

Great to hear that last update meets your expectations!
We do agree that unit selection for export is a little bit confusing. We are working on next update that is more clear for user. If you have any suggestions - feel free to announce it. One of our concept is to export csv file for averages that will always have all of the possible x and y units and the choice in menu would only correspond to pdf report. Please give as a hint if it would be ok or you would like to have an opportunity to choose units that will be exported.

We have no doubt that conservation professionals manage the experiment data perfectly. We only would like to note that the solution with multiple averages is not very flexible. You may not have possibility to average data from more than one group. User will need to keep in mind that data that will be averaged depends on the names of the samples (group name). Of course - if this is the most convenient for you - we can provide it.

We also have a concept to add to the software possibility to save the whole experiment state so later, all the collected data and user settings can be easily loaded. We would appreciate any suggestions to this functionality.

abedhaddad

@AnnaJ

Hi Ana,

I think it would be great to have the units were chosen for the export because imagine you are batch importing for statistical analysis, it would be great to have a single export parameter for both the x and the y. The more flexibility we have in the export choices the better I always think.

As for the averaging, I think it would be great to create averages directly from the group names- I think you will find that most users would prefer that. I would never average different groups together, really. I might compare the DE and the SD between similar groups, which is a better way of doing it than outright averaging. so it would be awesome to have averages that are automatically named and that you can create more than one at one time.

Also, can you describe the experiment state function more? like metadata? Happy to jump on a call sometime 🙂

abedhaddad

@zbyszek @AnnaJ @Piotr

Oh! Also looks like the width for the analytics curves cannot be changed like for the trial curves, could we adjust that as well?

Thanks!

abedhaddad

abedhaddad @AnnaJ @zbyszek @Piotr

oh! And on that note, can we also have the ability to change the color of the averaged curves as well?

AnnaJ

abedhaddad
You mean the width of the selected curve on plot? You would like to see the automatic change on plot when selection of average name on the left has changed?

abedhaddad

AnnaJ

Oh I haven’t though of it that way, and that could be nice as well. But what i meant was changing the width of all of the curves changes when i change the width setting except for the averaged curves, which are a bit thin.

abedhaddad

Hello,

@AnnaJ @zbyszek @Piotr

I wonder if there are any updates to reports in term of the analytics module?
Thanks,
Abed

AnnaJ

abedhaddad
Hello,
Yes, we are finalizing new realese. All the remarks that have been stated are taken into account. New, forthcoming realese has lots of updates - looking forward to hear your feedback.

abedhaddad

AnnaJ that sounds amazing! thank you for keeping me in the loop. Do you have a timeline for the new release?
Thanks!

AnnaJ

abedhaddad
Yes, new release should be ready till the end of the month. Sorry for the shift. Despite the fact we are now focused on conference preparation, we made lots of updates in MFT and looking forward to complete them and release.

abedhaddad

AnnaJ Hi Ana that is great to hear, thank you. Is the timeline still for a release this year?

AnnaJ

Yes, new release is in fact ready. We are performing the final debug.

abedhaddad

Fabulous! Thanks!

zbyszek

abedhaddad Here is the new release 3.0 of the software. Please, test it if you can.

Edit 27/12/2022:
Fixed RGB color mapping

Edit 22/12/2022:
Fixed CIE Lab calculations.

Edit 2/2/2023:
Fixed different integration times handling for white reference and the sample meausrements.

abedhaddad

zbyszek Hello!

Thank you for the new release! is there an associated manual? Also do I need to select a particular illuminant?

abedhaddad

@zbyszek @AnnaJ @Piotr

Some initial thoughts

Batch exporting of averaged data (or any data!) would be most welcome, right now I would have to export each averaged curve individually
Instead of using the LED names B1-B6, maybe the kelvin value would be more helpful? And does the choice of illuminant ultimately affect the measurement, I believe yes. Therefore it would be good to warn the user of that fact.

Will play with the software some more for sure. Thank you for this new release!

AnnaJ

abedhaddad

Thank you for the remarks.
Sure, we will take it into consideration preparing the next realese.
Any further remarks regarding the new release would be very appreciated!

zbyszek

abedhaddad And does the choice of illuminant ultimately affect the measurement, I believe yes. Therefore it would be good to warn the user of that fact.

Hi Abed!
You are right. The choice of illuminant in the Options does influence the aging curves. The choice of illuminant in the CIE Lab tab does not.
Please, check the Choice of illuminant post for detailed explanation and recommended choices.

« Previous Page Next Page »